​

​The Wars and Turmoil of 17th-Century Virginia

​

To understand John’s life, we must explore the broader historical forces shaping Virginia in 1636. This was a period marked by military skirmishes, broken alliances, and land dispossession. The Anglo-Powhatan Wars (1609–1646) created an atmosphere of instability and distrust. The Kikotan Nation, like many other tribes, experienced displacement, loss of life, and forced assimilation.

It is likely that John Kecotan was taken during one of these periods of upheaval, possibly as a child, and placed into an English household. Many Native children during this time were re-educated in English customs, language, and Christianity, and were often made to serve as laborers in colonial homes.

​

Indentured Servitude: John Kecotan and Ryse Howe

​

Records indicate that John Kecotan became an indentured servant to Ryse Howe, a member of the House of Burgesses, the first legislative assembly in the American colonies. The indentured servant system was a common feature of colonial life, involving individuals (often Europeans and Native Americans) who agreed to work without pay for a set number of years in exchange for passage to the colonies, food, and shelter.

​

However, John’s servitude likely wasn’t voluntary. As a Native American, his indenture would have been a result of colonial conquest and coercion, rather than a formal contract entered into freely. While it is not known how long John remained in service, such arrangements often lasted seven years or more and could result in harsh treatment and limited autonomy.

​

Despite this, many Native individuals used their time in servitude to learn trades, acquire language skills, and survive within a system designed to erase them. These acts of resilience and adaptation are part of the ongoing legacy of Indigenous endurance.

​

The Significance of Surnames in Indigenous Genealogy

​

One of the most profound takeaways from John Kecotan’s story is the use of surnames like “Kecotan” as cultural markers. For genealogists and descendants researching their Indigenous ancestry, names are powerful tools for tracing tribal lineage. In the absence of formal records, surnames passed down orally or through church, court, or colonial records may be the only link to a person's original tribal affiliation.

​

The Kikotan Nation, from which the name derives, was one of the many Native tribes impacted by English colonization in Virginia. Their original village near the mouth of the James River was overtaken in 1610 by English settlers, forcing surviving members to scatter or assimilate. The continued use of the “Kecotan” name well into the 1600s indicates that tribal identity persisted, even under erasure and oppression.

​

Reclaiming the Story: Why John Kecotan Matters Today

​

John Kecotan’s story speaks to the larger narrative of resilience, forced assimilation, and cultural survival. His life—although fragmented in the historical record—offers a rare window into what many Indigenous people experienced during the early colonial era in North America.

​

For descendants of the Tann, Kecotan, or other Indigenous families of Virginia, John’s name may appear in genealogical charts, church registers, land records, or indenture papers. These fragments can help reconstruct a lineage long buried by colonial systems of documentation that often omitted or anglicized Native identities.

​

The inclusion of names like John Kecotan in historical research allows us to recenter Indigenous narratives and confront the realities of cultural erasure and historical marginalization.